National and International

India Has Second Highest Adult Population Planning To Migrate: Report

United Nations: India has the second adults planning to migrate to other countries with the United States and the United Kingdom one of the most favored destinations, according to a report from the UN Migration Agency.

The United Nations migration agency, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), in its report, “Measuring Global Migration Potential 2010-2015,” which analyzes the intentions of population migration worldwide to The period 2010-2015 noted that, in general, 1.3% of the adult population said they plan to migrate permanently within the next 12 months.

The most popular destination for those planning to migrate is the United States, followed by the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, France, Canada, Germany and South Africa.

Half of those planning to migrate live in just 20 countries, led by Nigeria and followed by India, Congo, Sudan, Bangladesh and China.

In 4.8 million people, India has the second largest number of adults planned and prepared to migrate – 3.5 million people who plan and 1.3 million who are preparing.

For Nigeria, the number has 5.1 million people, 4.1 million Congo, and China and Bangladesh 2.7 million each.

Results from the IOM Global Migration Data Center (GMDAC) show that less than half of one percent of adults worldwide are actively preparing to migrate overseas. A follower in three proposed plans to migrate to a developing country.

West Africa, South Asia and North Africa are the regions where the potential of migration is the most important.

The study is based on data from the Gallup World Poll international survey.

“This unique global survey provides an important overview of people’s migration intentions and the profile of those most likely to migrate,” said IOM Director General William Lacy Swing.

The proportion of the adult population it provides to emigrate abroad has grown moderately in the world, but faster in some areas.

Adults who plan and prepare to migrate are more likely to be male, young, single, living in urban areas and more likely to have completed at least secondary education.

“Improving our understanding of people’s migration intentions could be useful for a variety of different policy goals.

This could help authorities plan migration, understand the best migratory pressures and to highlight the potential trends of migration in alternative sources of migration data are scarce, “he said.

The report, however, added that it is important to keep in mind that the extent of potential migration is not the same as measuring actual migration.

There are many reasons why a migration plan can not be realized, including political constraints, lack of resources, or a change of heart.

IOM Director General, Swing, added that the new study illuminates a trend that has emerged for some time, he said, is “a wide range of countries, rich and poor, that attract migrants.”

National and International

Diplomatic Channels Will Continue To Be Used With China: India On Doklam Standoff

NEW DELHI: India has said it will continue to use diplomatic channels with China to resolve the Doklam and insists that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping had had a “conversation on a number of issues “Hamburg during the G20 summit.

There is a contrast between the armies of India and China in the Doklam region in the sector of Sikkim, where Indian troops prevented Chinese soldiers to build a road on June 16

“We have diplomatic channels available.We have embassies from both countries.These channels will continue to be used,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Gopal Baglay said on being questioned about the single Doklam trigger the month.

He also referred to the comments of Foreign Affairs Secretary S Jaishankar during an event in Singapore on the subject.

M. Baglay noted that there were well-established and mutually agreed mechanisms to address differences in the border issue, as well as tri-unions.

“I refer to the information we posted after the meeting (in Hamburg). There was a photo I had tweeted.

There was a brief text … said during the informal meeting of BRICS leaders in Hamburg in the framework of the G-20 summit, BRICS leaders held an informal meeting was organized by China. ”

“The Prime Minister and President Xi Modi had a conversation on a number of issues,” Mr. Baglay said when asked about comments by the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman that there was a bilateral meeting between the two leaders.

However, he refused to give details on the “set of issues”, saying: “It is not for me to comment on the reasons given by the two leaders.”

On the question of whether Doklam also organized during the “conversation on the range of issues” between the Prime Minister of Modi and the President of China, Xi Mr. Baglay said: “There was a conversation between them.

There were a number of problems that have been the subject of this conversation. ”

He was asked if his remarks on Doklam’s diplomatic resolution oppose indicate a shift in China’s demand for the withdrawal of Indian troops from the region, indicated India has already indicated its position on the issue.

In strong rhetoric in the Chinese media warns India against Mr. Doklam Baglay said: “This issue we are dealing with is a serious problem and this has implications we are still committed to this issue ….”

If national security adviser Ajit Doval was traveling in Beijing on July 26, he said there was no information yet for now.

M. Doval, who is the special representative for the India-China border talks, is expected to visit Beijing on July 26 to attend the meeting of BRIC national security advisors – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Mr Baglay also declined to comment on the recent meeting between the top Chinese envoy and Congressional Vice-President Rahul Gandhi, saying the Foreign Affairs Department did not comment on the activities of embassies and political parties.

National and International

The Big Fight: If you thought Kumble vs Kohli was bad, COA vs CAC is much worse

At the height of the row Anil Kumble, Virat Kohli, one of the recurring suggestions often made sense: why not sit at the table and fix things?

Now, as the fights between the Committee of Directors appointed by the Supreme Court (COA) and the Advisory Committee of Cricket (ACC) reached embarrassing proportions, it may be time to ask the same question: why not sit at the table to fix things?

The constant back and forth between the two committees underscores a complete lack of transparency and communication between the two. So much so that even the absurd can strike a dark and twisted way so strange.

The program events that have occurred since Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman interviewed candidates for training in India is not only confusing but also very disturbing.

July 10: The CAC maintains the five candidates and decided to delay the decision because they felt the need to speak to the captain of India, Virat Kohli.

July 10: ACO President Vinod Rai called for ACC to complete the process before July 11. The news has been the subject of documents through a source.

July 11: Sourav Ganguly, however, was in doubt over the sudden implementation of the ACO. He said the ACO was part of the decision (to delay the announcement).

July 12: CAC appoints Ravi Shastri as team coach of India. They also appoint Rahul Dravid as a consultant for travel abroad and Zaheer Khan as a consultant for bowling.

July 12: BCCI issues a press release. The subject line of the email was sent: the Steering Committee welcomes the recommendation of the ACC trainer. It was an unsigned letter.

July 13: According to reports citing sources, the Directors’ Committee was not satisfied with the ACC’s decision to elect job counselors and bowling.

July 13: BCCI published another press release in which thanked Ganguly, Tendulkar and Laxman have performed “the assigned task with total transparency, professionalism and commitment of Indian cricket.”

July 14: The Mumbai Mirror bears a front page article quoting an unidentified COA source who talks about how the “Big Three have mined Ravi Shastri to name Zaheer and Dravid” and also mentions that Zaheer Dravid’s appointment will be examined and on Sunday July 16th).

July 14: ACC in very firm terms written a letter to the head of the CAC, Vinod Rai, which, of course, is released.

July 14: insider discloses that the COA will ask Zaheer Khan to waive the contract of the Indian Premier League work in India.

July 14: Another BCCI press release. This time, they affirm that Ravi Shastri was consulted before they are named Zaheer and Dravid.

The most troubling part of the whole issue should be how much the COA is severely compromised. They have only three members now – President Vinod Rai, Vikram Limaye Eduljee and Diana – and were appointed by the Supreme Court to reform the BCCI.

In fact, they have a mandate to resolve things in the way they see best. Despite this, you still feel the need to talk to newspapers and agencies as “sources.”

Surely they could have picked up the phone and called Ganguly, Tendulkar and Laxman. Instead, they chose a well-established BCCI and presented their views as the source.